The value of a void. Bridge Column for January 18, 2002, Harvey Bernstein East-West vulnerable. North deals. North S: A K 3 2 H: J 10 5 3 D: 10 8 C: K Q 10 West East S: 10 8 S: J 5 H: A 7 6 4 2 H: K Q 9 8 D: Q 6 2 D: A 9 5 4 3 C: 5 4 3 C: J 8 South S: Q 9 7 6 4 H: Void D: K J 7 C: A 9 7 6 2 The Bidding: North East South West 1C Pass 1S Pass 2S Pass 3C Pass 4S Pass Pass Pass It is very difficult to determine how important a void is during the bidding. In this example, North has a normal thirteen point opening bid. South has ten high card points and a void. They bid to a reasonable game contract in spades, and make twelve tricks. The first question that is usually asked when the play of a hand like this is finished is "Should we be there?" This, of course, refers to the fact that the North-South pair made enough tricks for a small slam. Well, if you have a way to determine that there are no wasted values in the suit where one partner has a void, you may have a chance to bid the slam, but it isn't likely. Look at what happens to the North-South combination with just a little tinkering: North S: A K 3 2 H: K Q 10 D: 10 8 C: J 10 5 3 South S: Q 9 7 6 4 H: Void D: K J 7 C: A 9 7 6 2 North is holding the exact same spot cards, just in different suits, and now South is going to have to play very well to score his game. The difference is that North's hearts are stronger and less useful opposite the void in the South hand, and the club suit is longer, but weaker. By the way, do you think that the bidding would be any different with the revised holding? I don't think so. It is very difficult to factor in the placement of the void. Concentrate on reaching a "normal" contract and don't worry about the rare possibility that you are missing a low percentage slam. _______________________________________________________ Bernstein is a free-lance writer in Solon.