Bidding for a poor result. Bridge Column for December 2, 2001, Harvey Bernstein East-West vulnerable. North deals. North S: Q 4 3 H: A 4 3 2 D: 5 C: 10 9 6 5 4 West East S: A 7 5 S: K 2 H: K 10 5 H: Q 7 D: Q J 10 9 8 7 D: A 6 4 3 C: 7 C: A K J 8 2 South S: J 10 9 8 6 H: J 9 8 6 D: K 2 C: Q 3 The Bidding: North East South West Pass 1NT 2H 3NT 4H Pass Pass Dbl Pass Pass Pass As difficult as it may be to believe, this hand is from a Fligh A team event. I present it in the hopes of showing the average player that the "A" level players are just as prone to flights of fancy as anybody else. East was not wild about his one no trump opening bid, but it appeared to be the best way to describe his values. The North- South pair was playing a defensive convention over one no trump openings where two hearts was used for a hand of unknown strength with both hearts and spades. In this situation, South had "no strength" along with both major suits. West bid the no trump game and North, thinking that he had a double fit and an outside singleton, bid four hearts as a non- vulnerable sacrifice. East had already bid his values and passed so that West could make the final decision. The opening club lead went to the king. East continued with the ace as West discarded the seven of spades. Responding to this signal, East led the king of spades. When the king held, he continued with a small spade to the ace. West led a diamond back to East's ace. The jack of clubs was trumped by South with the jack. West over trumped with the king. There was no way to avoid losing the queen of hearts later in the play, so South wound up losing seven tricks for down four, or minus 800 points. At the companion table, three no trump by East made five for plus 660, which worked out to a 4 IMP (international match point) swing. Players justify these bids for their "disruptive" value, but I think that overall, good bidding and play will prove to be more valuable. _______________________________________________________ Bernstein is a free-lance writer in Solon.