A difficult decision. Bridge Column for December 17, 2000, By HARVEY BERNSTEIN Both sides vulnerable. North deals. NORTH S: 4 3 H: A Q J D: Q J 10 9 8 C: K J 10 WEST EAST S: 7 5 S: K Q J 8 6 H: 9 7 6 4 3 H: 8 2 D: K 2 D: A 5 3 C: 8 5 3 2 C: 9 6 4 SOUTH S: A 10 9 2 H: K 10 5 D: 7 6 4 C: A Q 7 The Bidding:// NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST 1D 1S 2NT Pass 3NT Pass Pass Pass West leads the seven of spades against three no trump. Look at all four hands and decide if you want to defend or declare. Did you decide to declare? East plays the jack of spades and you duck. You win any spade continuation as cheaply as possible and start on diamonds. West wins the king and has no spade to continue with so you are safe and you can establish diamonds before the defense can score enough spade tricks to defeat you. Should that have been your choice? What if East plays a low spade at trick one? You are forced to win and when you lead a diamond West will be able to win the king and play a second spade. Now East can drive out your second spade stopper and still have the ace of diamonds to be able to regain the lead and defeat you. Don't feel bad if you made the wrong choice. This was a very difficult decision and it is very likely that the majority of players would automatically play the jack of spades to trick one when holding West's cards. The expert player will know that his partner has only one or two spades from the lead of the seven. He will also know that declarer has all of the outstanding high cards in that suit. If West held the seven- five-two of spades, he would have led the two, showing either three or four cards in the suit. There would also be the remote chance that he held a singleton, but then there is no defense whatsoever. __________________________________________________________________