Executing a simple squeeze. Bridge Column for June 18, 2000, By HARVEY BERNSTEIN Both sides vulnerable. South deals. NORTH S: A 4 3 H: 4 3 D: K J 8 7 C: A 8 5 4 WEST EAST S: Q 2 S: 10 H: A K 9 7 5 H: J 10 8 2 D: 10 9 6 5 D: Q 4 3 C: 10 7 C: K Q J 6 2 SOUTH S: K J 9 8 7 6 5 H: Q 6 D: A 2 C: 9 3 The Bidding:// SOUTH WEST NORTH EAST 1S 2H 3H 4C 4S Pass Pass 5H 5S Pass Pass Pass Thanks to Jim Bachelder of Columbus for this hand from a pair event at the All American Regional bridge tournament held last month in Independence. It is very difficult to determine when it is right to double the opponent's apparent sacrifice or to bid on to your own game. At matchpoints, the decision is more difficult because of the method of scoring. The worst case is to bid on, instead of taking a sure plus, and then to be defeated in your contract. West led the ace and king of hearts to the first two tricks against Bachelder's five spade contract. The ten of diamonds would have been an excellent lead to trick three, but for some unknown reason, West selected the ten of clubs. Bachelder went up with the ace and then ran seven rounds of spades. The end position after the sixth spade looked like this: NORTH S: Void H: Void D: K J 8 7 C: Void WEST EAST S: Void S: Void H: Void H: Void D: 10 9 6 D: Q 4 3 C: 7 C: K SOUTH S: 6 H: Void D: A 2 C: 9 The last spade simply destroyed East. He eventually decided to play for West to have the nine of clubs, based on the earlier lead of the ten. If this was the case, he would not need the king of clubs to guard that suit, and so discarded it. As a result, Bachelder was able to cash the nine of clubs and then take the last two tricks with the ace and king of diamonds. Plus 650 was an excellent score that justified his "bidding on". _____________________________________________________________________