Bridge Column for September 25, 1994 East-West vulnerable. South deals. NORTH S: Q 9 H: 6 D: A 6 4 3 C: K Q J 10 6 2 WEST EAST S: A 5 3 S: K H: 7 5 H: K 10 8 4 3 2 D: K J 10 9 8 D: 7 2 C: A 9 7 C: 8 5 4 3 SOUTH S: J 10 8 7 6 4 2 H: A Q J 9 D: Q 5 C: V o i d SOUTH WEST NORTH EAST 3S Pass 4S Pass Pass Pass This hand was dealt at a rubber bridge game, and while I wouldn't suggest three spades as the proper opening bid for the South hand, the player in that seat decided that the time was right for a "different" approach. Before reading on, decide whether you would like to declare or defend. West made the double dummy lead of a small spade. This was the only lead that did not give up the contract immediately. East won the king and returned the five of clubs. South pitched the five of diamonds and West won the ace. The ace of spades smothered dummy's queen, and the king of diamonds was led to force the ace from dummy. Declarer played the king and queen of clubs for heart pitches. Both defenders followed. He now had the unenviable task of deciding whether he should take the heart finesse, a fifty per cent play, or playing the jack of clubs for another heart pitch. This play would work if West held the fourth club. Since it was already known that clubs split 4-3, it was a fifty per cent chance that either defender had the last outstanding club. My question here is, was it necessary to come down to this delicate guess? What if declarer ruffs the club return at trick two? He can then play the ace of hearts and ruff a heart with the queen of spades. Now the king of clubs is played and if East plays low, declarer discards a heart. West is in with the ace of clubs and has no safe exit. It is also interesting to note that the defense will always prevail after a small spade lead if East shifts to a diamond at trick two. No matter what he tries, declarer must always lose two spade tricks along with a combination of two tricks in the other three suits. At the table, declarer took the heart finesse and made his contract.