East-West vulnerable. East deals. North S: J 7 4 2 H: K D: A J 9 8 3 2 C: Q 10 West East S: Q 10 9 5 S: 6 H: Q 10 9 3 2 H: J 8 7 4 D: 10 6 D: K 5 4 C: 8 7 C: A 6 5 4 2 South S: A K 8 3 H: A 6 5 D: Q 7 C: K J 9 3 The Bidding: East South West North Pass 1NT Pass 2C Pass 2S Pass 4NT Pass 5C Pass 6S Pass Pass Pass Opening lead: H3 Some of the best lessons in bridge come from errors that resulted in bad results. This is just such a hand. During a team event, North felt that his distribution justified a slam try. The methods that were being used would have allowed North to bid three diamonds after South showed his spade suit. This would have been forcing and would indicate a five or six card suit. South would have bid three no trump and North would then correct to four spades, which, in and of itself is a tough play. In the sequence shown, 4NT should be a quantitative bid showing four hearts and enough points to go to slam opposite a maximum no trump opening. Four Clubs would have been a Gerber bid, asking for aces. At any event, the only chance for six spades is to find the queen of spades doubleton and the king of diamonds onside. Since neither of these possibilities existed, the result was down three. At the other table, four spades was bid and made. The heart lead was won with the king. A spade to the ace was the entry for the diamond finesse, losing to East. The heart return was won in hand with the ace and a small spade was led toward the jack. West played the nine. The jack won and a small spade to the king was the entry that enabled South to ruff his last heart. Diamonds were played from the top and all the defense could come to was the king of diamonds, the ace of clubs and the queen of spades.